2. Body type? Sedan and nothing but the sedan. Most have nothing to say. You can certainly spoil the air about the center of gravity, aerodynamics, the volume of heated air in the cabin, scents from the trunk, DC tarahteniya trunk lid ... but better not. Those who buy a wagon, you know why he told them. I do not know why I wagon. Any Targ and carriages are not considered in this research. 3. Country of Origin? Nemetchina. Their cars are renowned for reliability, spare parts and service is complete, relatively inexpensive. The construction is very repairable, unlike the narrow-eyed and zaokeantsev. They are smaller than the others lose in value over time, and it's easier just to sell later (Peugeot sold more than 2 months and with a terrible creaking, being, in general, very good car. What to do - our customer is not quite aware of that image - nothing ...) Note also that the exterior design of almost all German cars 90s E-class does not cause unpleasant emotions, as opposed to technically quite good, but faceless, "soap" yaponomobiley. 4. Drive? Front or complete. Whatever anyone may tell, in the front drive wheel drive always paddle in the direction of their inversion, which gives more control over the car in difficult conditions. The rear - just right. In general, the correct drive - it's full, but far from all, and permanent four-wheel drive with 50/50 moment distribution and mechanical locking center differential. Why - a separate conversation. In short, the car is much more resistant polnoprivody on a slippery road for any reason at the expense of a more favorable distribution of the time on the wheels. Half the time in the car nedoprivodnom wheel is much easier to break in boxwood than a quarter on the all-wheel drive. There are other advantages. 5. Mark? Audi. Opel has been excluded because of the drive and the wretchedness of some image. Vectra - very close, Omega B - severe for the 2.0 8-klapannikom. 2.0 16 and 2.5 klapannikom Six - lomuchie. Heavy engines quickly kill the front suspension. Do not really like the exterior / interior, simple and banal. Bavarian engine builders with "five" E34 flew out of the drive, chassis stiffness and lomuchesti, cramped cabin, surly unfriendly interior design and image "car collector of tribute from the stalls." Mercedes W124 was dropped because of the drive, basically. Another argument was the unbearable boredom of this machine. But somehow it all so conservative and kondovo ... He travels the same way - without causing any strong feelings. Image has also suffered during the redistribution of property. Although, honestly, if it had not rear-wheel drive, the 124th would be considered. Volkswagen cars they have for the plebs - and too little functionality to the detriment of style. Passat B5 anything yet, but still pricey and buying, and in-service (multi-link suspension). What do we have left, except for Trabant and Porsche? That's right, Audi! 6. Model? 100/4A. Vosmidesyatki and A4 - close, though classmates big machines, not all decisions in the design like A80. A4 suffers from the typical multi-link suspension diseases, treat worth nehily money. Weaving in 44 body - a very good car, if not irreversibly outdated exterior - the model produced since 1983, and by the way, then won the title of "Car of the Year." Audi in the back of 4A (1991-1997) met all my needs. Fit only for the money weaving, A6 wrote in waiting list. Analysis of information on engines showed that 4A starts to go, and do not feel sick, with five-cylinder naturally aspirated engine AAR 2.3 liter, 133 hp I wanted to, of course, more powerful, but at the time of purchase options is small, then only just begun to weave fashion and swept at once - my choice fell exactly on the AAR, what now does not regret it. Practice has shown that the dynamics of the A100 with sixes 2.6 and 2.8 do not have fundamental differences from mine. Thoughts on the basis of the foregoing, and based on almost two years of operating experience Audi 100, so far no one has, and will not be able to convince me that the car can be better and more optimal, than an Audi. I am convinced that Audi - a great balance of consumer properties of the car, both technical and subjective. It is unlikely that I will ride on anything other than the Audi. PS: I forgot to tell you about all the double galvanized body parts for Audi:). audi-club.kiev.ua
No comments:
Post a Comment